Digitally exposed?

I have been in big discussions in the last few days – on social networking sites, ironically enough – concerning the truth and reality of relationships established and sustained through social networking. Statistics on the nature of human relationships and communication – saying that most communication is non-verbal, for example, and allegations that these relationships are somehow superficial, have been made in what has been a healthy, friendly discussion.

I have no problem with people disagreeing with me in this issue, healthy discussion can and should involve those who disagree, respecting one another’s opinions whilst engaging fully with the issue. Displaying love for one another in a Christ-like way, yet still confronting the issues head on – and it should be this way with all discussions which take place anywhere – in the digital realm and in the physical realm.

Yet I have also seen in the last week people I respect being involved in discussions on other issues, discussions which I have contributed too, but where the discussion has resulted in people I care about being upset, uncomfortable and hurt. The tone at times has been cruel and hurtful, people caring so much about being right and ‘winning’ the argument, that the core values of love and respect have been forgotten.

I have to say, being honest, seeing people I considered friends upset and offended in this way actually made me pretty angry. Put it this way, I wasn’t feeling too loving or respectful to the people that had treated them that way.

This is where religion, our own personal desire to be right, and our egos, simply get in the way of doing the basic, simple things like loving our neighbour – and, if necessary, our enemy. I fully admit in my own heart that I have felt a lot of these emotions and failings, which have been tough lessons for me to learn.

If we’re going to have discussions on social networking, we need to make sure our conduct there reflects the values we claim to believe in, the ones we claim that we seek to follow. It’s so easy to get caught up in the heat of the moment, especially when it’s a topic you’re passionate about.

So we need to make sure that we take a step back sometimes.

You might be able to hit delete, and delete a post – but you can’t take back the sentiment.

Once you’ve put it out there and it’s been read, it doesn’t matter if you delete it – it’s out there, people have responded to it, it’s impact goes on. What can happen then is that you end up having to post an apology, or even worse, lose a friendship over it. You can cause a great deal of pain and suffering to people with even a comment.

C.S.Lewis said pain is ‘God’s megaphone to rouse a deaf world’, and that has been proven to be true again. This experience has only served to convince me that the online world, the digital space, and the relationships we find there, are very real – as are the consequences of our interactions there.

The pain that my friends felt through their online reactions was not superficial.

It was not fake.

It was not false.

It was not any less painful than that felt through hurtful interactions with people face to face.

It was real.

To deny that is simply to deny reality.

Indeed, in a positive light, all the friendships I have made in the online space, the relationships I have built up through the digital realm, are all just as real. They happened. They exist. When I met some of those people in person, the emotion felt was not superficial, and connection was not false.

It was real – which brings me to my next point.

I think one of the reasons so many of us are afraid to admit the reality of the digital realm, is that the digital realm exposes truths about us that it’s much easier to hide behind in the physical realm – the realm that’s often termed ‘reality’ as opposed to the ‘virtual reality’ of the digital realm.

One accusation that has been made is that in the digital realm we construct a social self we can hide behind.

But the reality is, we do that anyway.

We all have a social self we present to the world, a personality and set of behaviours that we put on for people – and Facebook and Twitter are often merely reflections of that. That self may represent part of who we are, but it doesn’t represent the entire truth. There’s a self that we hide from people in the physical realm – and we can do the same in the digital realm.

The perception is that the digital realm is the place we go to hide.

There is a certain degree of truth in that, and in extreme cases it probably does happen – but the reality is we hide all the time, even in the physical realm. In one sense, all the digital realm does in this case is to highlight what is already true and make it more real.

I have found that with my own insecurities.

My fears about people’s opinions of me, my struggles with trusting others, my lack of confidence. The digital realm has only highlighted and made more real these insecurities and fears.

When we’re physically interacting with people, it’s a lot easier to hide in one sense. There’s more noise. More voices.

We can use certain language, phrases, expressions, to hide behind – and only very close friends or experts in body language would really be able to tell any different. We might have all these voices going on your head, all these doubts, but it’s easier to ignore them and pretend they aren’t there when we’re talking outloud or others are. We can forget the difficult stuff and ignore it.

But when we’re on a smartphone, or sitting in front of our computer, ironically, we simply can’t hide.

Physically, maybe.

But emotionally – oh no. In that space you can’t hide from the voices in your head or the emotions in your heart – the insecurities, doubts and fears that you have about yourself and your relationships with others.

In that space, they become even more real in one sense.

When we are faced with interaction with someone online and have a big discussion or debate, or are hanging on their response. Perhaps we make an impulsive comment and instinctively fear we might have ruined a perfectly good friendship, or someone makes a comment and we’re not sure what they are really thinking or whether it refers to us – all of which I have experienced – what we are actually facing are insecurities, doubts and fears which we have always had – and which we have about ourselves and people we physically engage with too, we’ve just never had the space or opportunity to acknowledge them.

I would argue very strongly in fact, that not only is the digital realm very real, and the relationships and interactions we forge there completely authentic, true and powerful, but that they actually expose the truth of who we are in way that is even more true than we experience in the physical realm.

Precisely because in the digital realm there is less physical noise, less distraction from the voices in our head, and it’s much harder to run away from them.

If you disagree and think the digital realm is only a ‘virtual’ realm, then that’s your right to believe that. But don’t try to convince me. My reflections and experiences have convinced me without doubt that the digital realm, the interactions we have there, the emotions we feel in those interactions, the relationships we establish there, the people that we engage with in that space, are very real, very true – and not at all superficial.

But before I conclude, let me make it clear – as I have in previous posts – we should never get lost and live in the digital realm. That’s not healthy at all, and not Biblical in fact.

Jesus makes clear that physical community and interaction with people is part of what it means to live a life following God – and we are all called to be part of the communities where we live and fully interact with them.

Building relationships and engaging with people, and local church and serving our communities, and building friendships in the physical realm, are absolutely important and vital to how we live.

If we get lost in the digital realm and only live there, we lose something, because put simply there is something you gain in physical interaction with people that you simply cannot replicate in the digital realm, something that’s part of how we were originally created. God designed us for physical, face-to-face interaction in one sense, and that’s one part of us we should not deny or hide from.

We were created for physical interaction with others, and we are called by Jesus to do that – so we must be engaged with the physical realm.

But the digital realm is not a place we go to escape.

It is simply another dimension to reality, a dimension which exposes truths of who we are in a way the physical realm can’t. It is not ‘virtual’. It is real, it is true, and it’s a realm that as Christians with a missional calling we must be engaging fully with.

That’s where we need to find the digital balance I talked about previously.

So as Christians I would say we are called to be interacting with the digital realm, being an example of Christ-like behaviour in that realm, and using that realm to moblise, encourage and equip people to serve the causes of God in the world – always acting and treating others, even those we disagree with, with love and grace.

Because it is real.

Because what happens there is real.

So in conclusion, I would argue that, ironically, it is engagement with the digital realm, what is ridiculously called (in my opinion), ‘virtual reality’, that in fact, exposes truths about us that it’s much easier to run away from in the physical realm – or what is called ‘real life’.

It’s only by being honest about these insecurities, doubts, and fears, and acknoweldging them, that we are able to enter fully into the process of discipleship that God has for us.

If the digital realm helps us to do that, it can add another dimension to our relationship with God, with others and indeed with ourselves, and actually aid us in the process of becoming better followers of Jesus.

Now, over to you:

What are your thoughts on this – do believe the digital realm is ‘real’ or ‘virtual’? Why?

Do you have a healthy balance of physical relationships and digital ones?

Do you see the digital realm as a missions field, for us to be witnessing to & discipling others?

How can we make the most of the digital realm for the causes of God?

 

Related posts:

The digital balance

Twitter-God? – Reflections on social networking & church

  • Pam Smith

    Great post James.

    I’ve been involved in online communities for the past 7 years and I’ve discovered that many people – myself included – find online relationships are MORE intense – and therefore potentially more affecting – than offline relationships.

    I think this can also work in the other direction, and sometimes the intensity of an online relationship can feel closer and more enjoyable than our offline relationships. 

    I think it’s important to realise that this intensity is as real as any other emotional response we have to other people. Both so we don’t inadvertently hurt others in our online dealings with them, and also so we don’t get ourselves into compromising positions by developing inappropriate relationships without realising that these ‘count’ in terms of fidelity and trust. 

    • Anonymous

      Thanks for the comment Pam, and for the RT as well. This post was part-inspired by our conversation – real conversation, clearly – on this issue on Twitter not long ago. I would have held it back for ‘digi-disciple’ but have another ready to go, and only one every two months (beginning to think I may have undersold myself there, we’ll see). Thanks for your comments, I totally agree with what you say. Some of my most intense and meaningful relationships and have been with people in the digital space, and they are all very real. Ours is an example – we still have not met (didn’t see you at CNMAC 11), but our friendship has had an impact on both of us & means a lot. 

      One thing I think is important in online discussions is not whether we agree or disagree, but how we treat each other. Our online conduct must always exude grace, love, and mercy, pursuing, displaying and advocating the way of Jesus. 

      Thanks again for your comment. :-)

  • Anonymous

    I always used to refer to things that happened to me in person as “irl” In real life because in a way Twitter was one thing and then the things that happened outside of that were a separate life in a way. 
    However it all happens to me so why should it in real life for one thing and virtual or online life for another. The hardest feeling I battle with myself when I meet bloggers and twitter people for the first time is “Have I portrayed myself truthfully online?” or “Will they like who I am in person?” I think the question used to be the second one but since #CNMAC11 I think I’ve tried to switch my position to have I been truthful to who I am and does that show when I meet someone in person.
    I have a group of 5 friends who I would call my “best friends” however having said that within the group there are two who really don’t get how I can be “friends” with people I have met across the internet and have never (or only once) met them in real life, I have 1 friend who is a bit more for it and gets that it’s something I enjoy and am passionate about in a way so “Okay do your thing but stay safe”. The last two who are my new-est friends of the bunch get the “twitter friendship” thing down to the ground. 
    Had it not been for Twitter I wouldn’t have met either of them. I was introduced to Becca (beccaspeaks) by a friend called Daren (daren140). I ended up writing a post about it back in November 2009 when I went to the conference – I also re-told the story in a way a few weeks ago when I commented on Katie Anderson’s post “Meeting ‘Online’ Friends ‘Offline’ – What’s Changed?” (You can find my post here: http://rockangel.co.uk/2011/09/15/comments-on-katies-blog-post/) This was more from a secular point of view rather than that based from a Christian perspective however it does still ask about the balance between online/offline relationships as such. 
    On the other hand I have Ruby – somewhere along the line we started chatting on Twitter, that expanded to email and then to the occasional snail mail and Skype video call – we’re now trying an app called Viber which means we can send sms/im between Australia and the UK for a small amount of data/wifi allowance – seems to be working well so far as long as we remember the time differences! Ruby and her husband met over the internet, and in the end he emigrated from the US to Australia to be with her and now they have been married almost 9 months or something like that. I do think it’s unusual that they met via the internet but how is it any different from me becoming pen pals with Ruby and writing to her and then meeting her – you just add a sprinkle of technology in there in a way. 
    I even looked into going to Ruby’s wedding – I’d known her about a year or two. I have friends in Melbourne so if there had been problems I could have got their help and assistance if needed so although I would have been the other side of the world in a way I wouldn’t have been on my own. (Yeah I know crazy lol) I do really hope that somewhere along the line I will able to meet Ruby in person and that we can actually have a real hug and hang out and drink tea/eat toast together (it sounds kinda silly but whenever I’m down Ruby says that’s what she’d get me as comfort food!)
    I would like to think that I do have a healthy balance – I am trying to step back a bit from social networking and stuff like that while our Sidekick gets settled (We’re becoming foster carers for a 12 year old and it’s going to be hard work but I really do believe that it’s an important move that needs to be made) 
    I don’t see why the digital realm can’t be a mission field? Okay so I’m not going to South Africa like my friend Suzie has this year, or to Cornwall to do beach missions etc but what if my mission field is blogging, Twitter, Facebook – God has given me these skills why can’t I use them?

    • Anonymous

      Thanks for the post Hannah, totally agree that the digital realm is a missions field – certainly I see it as one, it’s an amazing opportunity I think in that respect. Great to hear a few of your stories as well – I think the balance between physical/digital relationships is important, but both are equally real though. Thanks for sharing the links too, will take a look. Been loving reading your blog so far too! Thanks again for the comment, great to get people’s feedback. :-)

  • Anonymous

    I missed the link to Katie’s post it’s http://katieandersonblogs.com/2011/09/14/meeting-online-friends-offline-whats-changed/

  • Loo (Lorraine)

    Hello James,

    Good article, and Pam has born witness to how Loo Zeta has been abused online.

    I created the character as an avatar in second life and exposed myself to international ministry. Initially I enjoyed and found enrichment in learning since 1st October 2006. I have fed much to Tim Hutchings PhD.

    I am married to a psychotherapist and a lot of what has been experienced has been my own naivety, but much has also been people whom project their perceptions of me behind the character. I am a carer by profession, but goodness I have had to toughen up. Many of these individuals have caused me to close the computer in tears, and then seen my character systematically devalued. Yes these are Christians.

    Why? I think it can be found in the fundamentals of group identity. You will conform to my belief system or I will reject you.

    During my time on the net I have seen a lot of ego projection, and mutual stroking. People promoting themselves as ‘experts’. Award winning blogs promoted by ‘friends’, and giving themselves prizes. A lot of frustration being expressed as ‘Klout’ has ‘devalued’ their perceived worth as it recalculates internet activity.

    People should be careful, I have seen vulnerable individuals targeted, by well meaning individuals promoting their own self importance and mutual psychic need.

    Much is made about being ‘authentic’, specifically from the Christian community, but this can expose individuals. An element of wariness should be exercised. Whom owns the dominant narrative and what voices are promoted, and others suppressed!

    I too have been dismayed with a lot of discourse and felt myself patronised this last week, and knowledge I had forming the basis of somebody else’s paper, without initial acknowledgement.

    I did toy with the idea of discontinuing the account, or changing ‘loozeta’ on twitter, but then the others win….. and well in the great scheme of things it is of little significance, honest. It is a game where people are setting the rules to suit themselves.

    GB
    Lorraine

    • Anonymous

      Lorraine, thanks so much for your comment, and your honesty. It must have taken courage to share what you have, and it’s tragic that you’ve had to go through those experiences. I pray that you no longer have to deal with that so much. Thanks again for commenting, it means a lot. God bless.

  • http://twitter.com/mwalimurural Simon Martin

    I don’t often respond to blogs, but wanted to comment on one point you made, James.
    You say “the digital realm is not a place we go to escape”. For you it clearly isn’t, for me it probably isn’t; but in my limited experience it definitely IS a place of escape for others.
    Sometimes to create an idealised character for themselves, as you allude to; sometimes to create – consciously or otherwise – a Hyde character to their customary Jekyll, though I suspect this merely reflects the complexities of their overall personality; and sometimes for kicks – to be as outrageous or contrary as they can.
    But there is another group of people who escape from a situation by creating a persona for themselves in social media (most often Twi**er) that allows them to say things that they feel & think in reality, but cannot say or think AS their true identity. I know a couple of Christian ministers who post anonymously and try very hard (and generally successfully) to avoid anyone being able to identify either them or their locations. This is the only way they seem to have to be able to say things that would shock or offend their congregations or colleagues … or at the very least leave them open to misinterpretation.
    This is also a form of escape – escape from convention, from expectations, from a straightjacket – and social media seems to provide them the only means they have of being able to question, discuss, interact and – quite frankly – survive.I’m not one of those people, but there are things I am happy to tweet that I would never put on FB, simply becuase of the almost complete non-overlap between these two online communities. But that is true for me in the physical world. I’m just as worried about upsetting my virtual friends as I am my physical ones; and there are physical friends & colleagues with whom I would never share what I share with others. Why should social media-based relationshiops function any differently to face-to-face ones?
    Thanks for a very though-provoking blog overall, though.

    • http://jamesprescott.co.uk/blog James Prescott

      Thanks for the comment Simon, I think I do allude to the fact that the digital realm is a place we can go to escape if its abused. That obviously isn’t a healthy thing, and I make clear the importance of face-to-face interaction in our relationships. I recognise that there are certain elements on one social network we may not disclose or get involved in on another. There are many people I dialogue with on FB that aren’t even on Twitter so I don’t end up dialoging with there. I think like anything this is open to abuse, I think as Christ-followers we need to be setting the definitions of what healthy boundaries are and also being an example in our behaviour too, in how we treat each other and others who disagree with us. Hopefully then we can help make the digital realm safer and more Christ-like. Thanks again for your comment, much appreciated!

    • Anonymous

      Thanks for this Simon, great to hear your thoughts.

  • Jo Royal

    Great post – enjoyed reading and thinking!  I don’t really have much to add that hasn’t already been said – but I do think that the online world is as varied as the ‘real’ world.  Each has their own experience of online reality and relationships.  I often think about the virtual world providing an environment in which people can hide, and take on a persona that they think works best.  However, having had quite a few years of online experience in different areas, I actually think my ‘real’ character shows more online than it does offline.  I actually feel more at ease sharing my thoughts, hopes, dreams, fears online than I generally do face to face with people.  As a youth worker I encourage young people to talk – and if this works best for them online – than I have no issue with it (all within safe boundaries of course).   As a young person I would NEVER have had the confidence to approach my youth worker and expect them to pay me any time or attention.  I just didn’t have enough self-esteem for that.  However, I did write the occasional note, because they could then read it in their own time under no pressure.  I would have probably dealt with a lot of stuff earlier on in life if the internet had been as readily available as it is now.  So – it works for me now, and I am sure it would have done when I was younger too.  I have made some great friends online, a lot of whom I have now met face to face.  So – to me – the digital realm is very real.  But I know that is for me – and like I said at the beginning – there is such a variety of experiences of the digital realm out there.  I can accept that.  Works for me, but not everyone – and I need to ensure I allow ‘real’ relationships to develop and flourish as well.

    As far as the digital realm being a mission field – absolutely!  Why not?  I am sure God is creative enough to speak through blogs, tweets, fb walls etc.  We just need to be willing to be used in this way – and this involves taking care over our online presence and writing with integrity.  My blog gets read by quite a lot of my non-Christian friends – and I love that.  They feel safe enough to read it, whereas they may feel uncomfortable discussing it face to face.  They often comment – or ‘like’ the blog – and sometimes offline discussions will continue afterwards.  So – yes, I do see the digital realm as a tool for talking about Jesus and discipling others.  And I believe it works. 

    I guess the key to it all is digital/real balance – but how this balance looks will differ from person to person.

    Thanks James – I enjoyed thinking this through :)

    Jo

    • http://www.jamesprescott.co.uk James Prescott

      Thanks for commenting Jo, great to hear you thoughts. I totally agree the digital realm is a missions field – such a big opportunity for us! I do think calling it the ‘virtual’ world is a pretty redundant term now, why I prefer the term ‘digital realm’. But get your points, and generally agree with you – the key is balance (my previous post on this subject was called ‘digital balance’ funnily enough!). Thanks for sharing this, great to hear from you.

  • Pingback: Guest blogging & developments on this site | James Prescott

  • Pingback: Social Media (1) Which world do you live in? | James Prescott

  • Pingback: Social Media: Taking a break | James Prescott